بررسی ارتباط باورهای تیمی امنیت روانی و سودمندی تیم بر عملکرد کلانتری های شهر همدان

نویسندگان

1 گروه مدیریت دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد ایران

2 کارشناس ارشد مدیریت بازرگانی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

3 گروه مدیریت بازرگانی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

چکیده

هدف، تحلیل چگونگی تأثیر باورهای امنیت روانی و سودمندی تیم (به عنوان متغیرهای مستقل) بر میزان عملکرد تیم (به عنوان متغیر وابسته) و با در نظر گرفتن متغیر رفتاریادگیری (به عنوان استراتژی تحقیق مبتنی بر روش پیمایشی- تحلیلی برای تبیین فرضیات در قالب مدل معادلات ساختاری استفاده شده است. جامعة آماری تحقیق را نیروهای شاغل در واحدهای کلانتری شهرستان همدان به تعداد 300 نفر تشکیل داده‌اند که در مجموع شامل 8 تیم می‌شدند. یافته‌های بدست آمده نشان از تاثیر مستقیم رفتار یادگیری بر عملکرد، امنیت روانی بر رفتار یادگیری، امنیت روانی بر عملکرد، سودمندی بر عملکرد، سودمندی تیم بر رفتار یادگیری تائید شد، هم‌چنین نقش واسط رفتار یادگیری در تاثیرگذاری امنیت روان‌شناختی بر عملکرد تائید و نقش واسط رفتار یادگیری در تاثیرگذاری سودمندی تیم بر عملکرد تیم رد شد.نتایج نشان داد که امنیت روانی و سودمندی تیم، تأثیر معناداری بر رفتار یادگیری دارند، اما آن‌چه که از همه مهم‌تر جلوه می‌نمود تائید متغیر واسط) بر مبنای مدل یادگیری تیمی ادموندسون بوده است. که در مطالعة حاضر از نقش واسط رفتار یادگیری در تاثیرگذاری امنیت روانی بر عملکرد و معنادارتربودن تاثیر مستقیم سودمندی بر عملکرد تیم نسبت به تأثیر غیر مستقیم آن بر عملکرد از طریق نقش واسط رفتار یادگیری بود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Studying the Relationship between psychological safety and team efficacy on team performance (Study: police stations in Hamedan)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Saeed Mortazavi 1
  • Mostafa Rezaei’rad 2
  • Amin Javidi 3
چکیده [English]

In the literature, many studies examine different aspects of learning behavior. However in few of these studies, the effects of psychological safety and team efficacy are considered. The purpose of this study, is to analyze the impacts of psychological safety beliefs and team efficacy (as the independent variable) on team performance (as dependent variable), while learning behaviors is considered as moderator variable based on Edmondson model of team learning. The Proposed model was tested on a sample of 108 people police stations in Hamedan. The results showed that psychological safety and team efficacy, significant impacts on learning behavior. But the most important point is that the direct impact of team efficacy on performance was more than indirect impact of team efficacy on performance through the moderator role of the learning behavior

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Psychological Safety
  • team efficacy
  • learning behavior
  • team performance
- هومن، حیدر علی (1387)، مدل یابی معادلات ساختاری با کاربرد نرم افزار لیزرل، چاپ دوم، تهران: انتشارات سمت.

- Argyris, C. (1993), Knowledge for Action: A Guide to Overcoming  Barriers to Organizational Change, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

- Baer, M., & Frese, M. (2003), Innovation is not enough: climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 45-68.

- Brown, R. (1990), Politeness theory: Exemplar and exemplary. In i. Rock(ed.), The legacy of Solomon Asch: Essays in Cognition and Social Psychology: 23- 37. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

- Bunderson, J. S. & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2003), Management team learning orientation and business unit performance”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 552-60.

- Carmeli , A. (2007), Social Capital ,Psychological Safety And Learning Behaviors from Failure in Organisations, Long Range Planing , 40 , 30-44.

- Cohen, S. & Bailey, D. (1997), What makes teams work: group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite, Journal of Management, 23( 3), 239-90.

- Druskat, V. U., & Kayes, D. C. (2000), Learning versus performance in short term project teams, Small Groups Research, 31(3), 328–353.

- Dutoon, J. (1993), The making of organizational opportunities: An interpretive pathway to organizational vhange. In L. L. Cumming & B. M. Staw (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 15: 195- 226, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

- Easterby, S. (1997), Disciplines of organizational learning: Contributions and critiques, Human Relations, 50(9), 1085-1113.

- Edmondson A. C. (2002), The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A group-level perspective,Organization Science 13, 128-146 .

- Edmondson, A. C., & Rollf, K. S. (2006), Three perspective on Team Learning :Outcome Improvement ,Task Mastery, And Group Process", In A Brief and Walsh(Eds),The Academy of Management Annuals, Volume 1.

- Edmondson, A., & Woolley, A. W. (2003), Understanding outcomes of organizational learning interventions. In M. Easterby-Smith, & M. Lyles (Eds), International Handbook on Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management (pp. 185-211). London: Blackwell.

- Edmondson, A. (1999), Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams,Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350-83.

- Edmondson, A. Bohmer, R.M. & Pisano, G.P., (2001), Disrupted routines: team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 46,pp. 685-716.

- Edmondson, A.C. (2003), Speaking up in the operating room: how team leaders  promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams, Journal of Management  Studies, 40, 1419–1452.

- Fernandez-Ballesteros, R., Diez-Nicolas, J., Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., & Bandura, A. (2002), Determinants and structural relation of personal efficacy to collective efficacy, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 107–125.

- Fornell, C. Larcker, D. (1981), Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (2), 39–50.

- Gibson, C., & Vermeulen, F. (2003), A healthy divide: Subgroups as a stimulus for team learning behavior,  Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 202-239.

- Goffman, E. (1955), On lace-work: An analysis of ritual elements In social inter­action, Psychiatry, 18: 213- 231.

- Guzzo, R. A., Yost, R. J., & Shea, G. P. (1993), Potency in group: Articulating a construct, British Journal of Social Psychology, 32: 87-106.

- Hackman, J. R. (1987), The design of work teams." In J, Lorsch (ed.l. Handbook of Organizational Behavior: 315-342. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

- Katzenbach, J. & Smith, D. (1993), The discipline of teams, Harvard Business Review, 71( 2),  111-20.

- Kolb, David A. (1984), Experiential Learning, Engle­wood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

- Lee, F., Edmondson, A. C., Thomke, S., & Worline, M., (2004), The mixed effects of inconsistency on experimentation in organizations, Organization Science, 15(3), 310-326.

- Lent, R. W.,  Brown, S. J., & Schmidt, L. ( 2005), Collective efficacy beliefs in student work teams: Relation to self-efficacy, cohesion,and performance, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68 (2006) 73–84

- Levine, M., & Richard L. M. (1991), Culture and socialization in work groups, In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (eds.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition:257-279, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

- Levitt, B., &  James, G. M. (1988), Organizational learning", An­nual Review of Sociology, 14: 319-340. Palo Alto, CA: An­nual Reviews.

- MacDuffie, J. P. (1997), The road to root cause: Shop-floor problem-solving at three auto assembly plants, Management Science, 43, 479-502.

- Mi Sook, D. (2006), Predicting Psychological Safety And Its Outcome In The Workplace, San Jose State  University, Phd Dissertation.

- Michaei, D. N. (1976), On Learning to Plan and Planing to Learn, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

- Ross ,T.M. C., & Jones, E(2008), Can team effectiveness be predicted? Team Performance Management, 14 ( 5/6), 248-268.

- Sanna, L. J., &  Lance, S. (1990), Valenece of anticipated evaluation and social facilitation, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 82- 92.

- Schenkel, M., & Garrison, G. (2009), Exploring the roles of social capital and team-efficacy in virtual entrepreneurial team performance, Management Research News, 32 ( 6), 525-538.

- Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998), Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis, Psychological Bulletin, 124, 240–261.

- Tynan, R. (2005), The effects on threat sensitivity and face giving on dyadic psychological safety and upward communication, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 223-247.

- Van, W. (2009), The relationships between team learning activities and team performance, Personnel Review , 38 ( 5), 560-577.

- Zellmer-Bruhn, M. & Gibson, C. (2006), Multinational organization context: implications for team learning and performance, Academy of Management Journal, 49, 501-18.